Anti-War Voices (7)

 

Anti-War movements have always been discredited and ignored by our government. While censorship and subsequent punishment aren't protected, the government is still getting away with gatekeeping websites like Antiwar.com and The American Conservative. 

War has a few "benefits" to government and economy, such as maintaining power or economic interests, but war hasn't always been just for beneficial reaping. Some war participation protects "national security" or fights to solve social issues. Unfortunately, America has not been involved in war for these reasons in many decades. 

Many of the wars America participates in are controversial, keeping the media on their side is ideal to eliminate political backlash. Hiding sites like Antiwar.com keeps the more extreme anti-war ideas out of media attention, allowing the government to control citizen perception and keep popularity. War is a sensitive topic that is usually a major influence on people's political perception. With easy, widespread access to these resources, both parties would lose support and receive a lot of backlash.

Allowing citizens access to sites that have endless anti-war stories and influences gives a greater power to the people, as our first amendment right covers protection to protest and press. Additionally, it allows for greater education, most likely leading to higher voter turnout and ultimately a loss in power. 

War being such a controversial, and hot, topic in today's society, it does not surprise me that there is a level of "censorship" on anti-war websites. This "censorship" is a big reason I advocate for doing your own extensive research. It is important for all citizens to do what they can and educate themselves on all policies and plans, especially when our country is involved in war. 

War is fatal and dangerous, and not many parties have anyone's best interest in mind. Holding our government accountable and informing ourselves on issues like this is important.